What is Graphene (GFN) crypto coin? Facts, supply issues, and why it's not trading
Jul, 23 2025
Graphene (GFN) Token Status Checker
Check if Graphene (GFN) tokens are tradeable based on circulating supply data. The article reveals GFN has zero circulating supply across all major exchanges, making it impossible to trade.
Results
Enter values to see market cap calculation.
Market Cap: $
Market cap = Price × Circulating Supply
Graphene (GFN) is a cryptocurrency project that claims to be a modular, community-driven blockchain platform built for scalability and security. But if you're looking to buy it, trade it, or even find reliable price data, you’ll quickly hit a wall. Despite having over 3,350 token holders, the circulating supply of GFN is listed as zero across nearly all major cryptocurrency tracking platforms. That’s not a typo. No GFN tokens are actively moving in the market. And that changes everything about what this coin actually is right now.
Where did Graphene (GFN) come from?
Graphene launched on October 11, 2021, as a successor to an earlier project called Phore, which started back in 2017. The same team behind Phore created GFN and distributed it through an airdrop to Phore holders. The token was deployed on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC), meaning it’s not a standalone blockchain - it’s a token built on top of another network. That’s important. It means Graphene doesn’t have its own miners, validators, or native transaction processing system. It relies on BSC to function.
The project says it uses sharding technology and the Casper consensus protocol, both advanced tools for scaling blockchains. It’s also built using the Go programming language, which is known for speed and efficiency. On paper, that sounds promising. But here’s the problem: none of that matters if no one can use the token.
Why is the circulating supply zero?
This is the biggest red flag. Circulating supply means the number of tokens that are actually out in the open, available to trade or use. For Graphene, that number is zero. But CoinMarketCap and other sites still list 3,350 holders. How is that possible?
It means the tokens exist in wallets - but they’re not being moved. They’re stuck. Maybe they’re locked in smart contracts. Maybe the team hasn’t released them yet. Maybe the exchange listings never happened. Whatever the reason, if you can’t buy GFN on Binance, Coinbase, KuCoin, or any other major platform, then it’s not a working cryptocurrency. It’s a digital asset in limbo.
Even the price data is all over the place. WorldCoinIndex says GFN is worth $0.000518. Crypto.com says $0.0002163. WEEX says $0. CoinMarketCap says $0. There’s no consensus. No trading volume. No real market. That’s not volatility - that’s absence. When a coin has no trading activity, price estimates are just guesses based on outdated or fake data.
Who’s holding GFN - and why?
3,350 people hold GFN tokens. That’s not a lot for a crypto project, especially one that’s been around since 2021. Most successful tokens have tens or hundreds of thousands of holders. So who are these people?
Most of them are likely early Phore users who got GFN as an airdrop and never touched it again. There’s no evidence of active trading, no community chatter on Reddit or Twitter, no Telegram groups with real discussions. No developer updates. No blog posts. No GitHub commits. If you search for “Graphene crypto” on Google, you won’t find a single reputable news site covering it. CoinCodex says it can’t predict GFN’s price because there’s not enough historical data - and that’s because there’s been almost no trading.
Without active users, there’s no network effect. Without network effect, there’s no value. And without value, there’s no reason for exchanges to list it.
How does Graphene compare to other blockchains?
Graphene says it’s competing with Ethereum, Polygon, and other Layer 1 or modular blockchains. But here’s the reality: those projects have millions of users, billions in TVL (total value locked), and thousands of developers building on them every day. Graphene has none of that.
Projects like Cosmos and Polkadot built ecosystems with real interoperability, developer grants, and incentive programs. Graphene has a website - getgraphene.io - but no documentation, no API references, no SDKs, no tutorials. If you’re a developer and you want to build on Graphene, you’re out of luck. There’s nothing to build on.
Even its use of Casper and sharding doesn’t matter if it’s not running independently. It’s like claiming your car has a Formula 1 engine - but it’s sitting in a garage with no fuel, no keys, and no road to drive on.
Is Graphene (GFN) a scam?
It’s not clearly a scam - at least not in the way Ponzi schemes or rug pulls operate. There’s no evidence the team stole funds or disappeared. The token was airdropped, not sold in an ICO. The team has a track record with Phore.
But it’s also not a working project. It’s a ghost. A digital artifact with no function. And in crypto, that’s worse than a scam. Scams at least move money. Graphene just sits there.
If you’re holding GFN, you’re holding something that can’t be spent, traded, or used. It’s like owning a gift card for a store that closed five years ago. The number on the card still exists. But you can’t use it.
What should you do if you own GFN?
If you got GFN in an airdrop and never touched it, you’re probably not alone. Most people who received it forgot about it. If you want to check its status, go to getgraphene.io. But don’t expect much. The site doesn’t have a whitepaper, roadmap, or team page. It’s barebones.
Don’t invest more money into GFN. Don’t buy it on any exchange. There’s no liquidity. No buyers. No sellers. Even if you find a platform listing it, the price is meaningless. The token isn’t tradeable.
And if you’re hoping for a future comeback - be realistic. Projects with zero trading volume for over three years rarely come back. The crypto market doesn’t wait. It moves on. Ethereum, Solana, and newer modular chains are growing fast. Graphene hasn’t moved at all.
Final takeaway: Graphene (GFN) is not a working crypto
Graphene (GFN) is not a cryptocurrency you can use. It’s not a coin you can trade. It’s not an investment you can make. It’s a token with no supply in circulation, no trading activity, no documentation, and no community. It exists as a digital record - but nothing more.
There’s no conspiracy. No secret roadmap. No hidden development. Just silence. And in crypto, silence means death.
If you’re looking for a real modular blockchain with active development, look at Cosmos, Polkadot, or even Polygon. They have teams, users, and code you can see. Graphene has none of that.
So what is Graphene (GFN)? It’s a relic. A footnote. A warning sign about what happens when a crypto project stops communicating - and stops moving.
Savan Prajapati
November 27, 2025 AT 14:14GFN is dead. Zero supply, zero trading, zero future. Why are people still talking about it? Just delete it from your portfolio and move on.
Brian Bernfeld
November 28, 2025 AT 01:37This is such a classic crypto ghost story. I’ve seen this exact pattern before - airdrop hype, zero follow-through, and then silence. The team probably got bored or ran out of funds. What’s wild is how CoinMarketCap still lists it like it’s alive. It’s like keeping a tombstone on a website and calling it a living business. Sad, but not surprising. If you’re holding this, you’re not investing - you’re just preserving a digital fossil.
Ian Esche
November 29, 2025 AT 00:15USA doesn’t need this garbage. If you’re building a blockchain and you can’t even get it listed on Binance, you’re not a developer - you’re a delusional hobbyist. This is why crypto gets a bad name. We got real innovation over here, not this zombie token pretending to be something it’s not. Time to bury this thing and focus on real tech.
Felicia Sue Lynn
November 30, 2025 AT 12:53It’s fascinating how we assign meaning to digital artifacts - tokens, NFTs, blockchain records - as if their existence alone confers value. But value requires movement, interaction, participation. GFN is a mirror held up to the crypto community’s tendency to romanticize potential over function. It doesn’t represent fraud so much as abandonment. A quiet, almost poetic failure. We mourn the living projects that die; we rarely notice the ones that never truly lived.
Christina Oneviane
December 1, 2025 AT 08:37Oh wow, GFN still exists? I thought it got deleted along with my hopes and dreams after the 2021 airdrop. Guess I should’ve cashed out… oh wait, I couldn’t. Because it’s a digital ghost. Congrats, GFN - you’ve achieved the ultimate crypto dream: being more valuable as a memory than as a token. 🎉💀
Vance Ashby
December 1, 2025 AT 21:34lol i remember when i got this in my wallet and thought "oh cool free money"... then checked the price and saw $0.0000001. checked again 3 years later... still $0.0000001. the website still has the same 2021 banner. no updates. no blog. no devs. just a domain name and a dream. i think the team moved on to selling nfts of their cat. 🐱